IIA Institutional Repository

Non-conventional approach for deriving the radial sizes of coronal mass ejections at different instances: discrepancies in the estimates between remote and in situ observations

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Agarwal, Anjali
dc.contributor.author Mishra, Wageesh
dc.date.accessioned 2024-11-29T05:19:56Z
dc.date.available 2024-11-29T05:19:56Z
dc.date.issued 2024-11
dc.identifier.citation Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 534, No. 3, pp. 2458-2474 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0035-8711
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2248/8587
dc.description Open Access en_US
dc.description This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
dc.description.abstract Understanding the evolution of radial sizes and instantaneous expansion speeds of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) is crucial for assessing their impact duration on Earth’s environment. We introduce a non-conventional approach to derive the CME’s radial sizes and expansion speeds at different instances during its passage over a single-point in situ spacecraft. We also estimate the CME’s radial sizes and expansion speeds during its journey from the Sun to 1 au using the 3D kinematics of different CME features, including the leading edge, centre, and trailing edge. The continuous 3D kinematics of the CME is estimated by employing the graduated cylindrical shell and stereoscopic self-similar expansion reconstruction methods on multipoint observations from coronagraphs and heliospheric imagers combined with the drag-based model. We choose the 2010 April 3 CME as a suitable case for our study, promising a more accurate comparison of its remote and in situ observations. We show that the introduced non-conventional approach can provide better accuracy in estimating radial sizes and instantaneous expansion speeds of CMEs at different instances. We examine the aspect ratio of the CME, which influences its expansion behaviour and shows the discrepancy between its value in the corona and interplanetary medium. Our study highlights significant inconsistencies in the arrival time, radial size, and expansion speed estimates obtained from remote and in situ observations. We advocate for future studies leveraging multispacecraft in situ observations and our non-conventional approach to analyse them to improve the comprehension of CME dynamics in the solar wind. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society en_US
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2260
dc.rights © 2024 The Author(s)
dc.subject Sun: corona en_US
dc.subject Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs) en_US
dc.subject Solar en_US
dc.subject Terrestrial relations. en_US
dc.title Non-conventional approach for deriving the radial sizes of coronal mass ejections at different instances: discrepancies in the estimates between remote and in situ observations en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account