| dc.contributor.author | Kumar, Harsh | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gupta, Rahul | |
| dc.contributor.author | Saraogi, Divita | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ahumada, Tomás | |
| dc.contributor.author | Andreoni, Igor | |
| dc.contributor.author | Anupama, G. C | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aryan, Amar | |
| dc.contributor.author | Barway, Sudhanshu | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bhalerao, Varun | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chandra, Poonam | |
| dc.contributor.author | Coughlin, Michael W | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dimple | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dutta, Anirban | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ghosh, Ankur | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ho, Anna Y. Q | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kool, E. C | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kumar, Amit | |
| dc.contributor.author | Medford, Michael S | |
| dc.contributor.author | Misra, Kuntal | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pandey, Shashi B | |
| dc.contributor.author | Perley, Daniel A | |
| dc.contributor.author | Riddle, Reed | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ror, Amit Kumar | |
| dc.contributor.author | Setiadi, Jason M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yao, Yuhan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T06:12:52Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T06:12:52Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-06 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 513, No. 2, pp. 2777–2793 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1365-2966 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2248/8018 | |
| dc.description | Restricted Access | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | We present results from extensive broadband follow-up of GRB 210204A over the period of 30 d. We detect optical flares in the afterglow at 7.6 × 105 s and 1.1 × 106 s after the burst: the most delayed flaring ever detected in a GRB afterglow. At the source redshift of 0.876, the rest-frame delay is 5.8 × 105 s (6.71 d). We investigate possible causes for this flaring and conclude that the most likely cause is a refreshed shock in the jet. The prompt emission of the GRB is within the range of typical long bursts: it shows three disjoint emission episodes, which all follow the typical GRB correlations. This suggests that GRB 210204A might not have any special properties that caused late-time flaring, and the lack of such detections for other afterglows might be resulting from the paucity of late-time observations. Systematic late-time follow-up of a larger sample of GRBs can shed more light on such afterglow behaviour. Further analysis of the GRB 210204A shows that the late-time bump in the light curve is highly unlikely due to underlying SNe at redshift (z) = 0.876 and is more likely due to the late-time flaring activity. The cause of this variability is not clearly quantifiable due to the lack of multiband data at late-time constraints by bad weather conditions. The flare of GRB 210204A is the latest flare detected to date. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society | en_US |
| dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1061 | |
| dc.rights | © Royal Astronomical Society | |
| dc.subject | Methods: data analysis | en_US |
| dc.subject | Gamma-ray burst: general | en_US |
| dc.subject | Gamma-ray burst: individual: GRB 210204A | en_US |
| dc.title | The long-active afterglow of GRB 210204A: detection of the most delayed flares in a gamma-ray burst | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |