IIA Institutional Repository

Search for anomalous alignments of structures in planck data using minkowski tensors

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Joby, P. K
dc.contributor.author Pravabati, C
dc.contributor.author Ghosh, T
dc.contributor.author Vidhya Ganesan
dc.contributor.author Ravikumar, C. D
dc.date.accessioned 2020-11-11T01:07:38Z
dc.date.available 2020-11-11T01:07:38Z
dc.date.issued 2019-01
dc.identifier.citation Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2019, No. 1, 09 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1475-7516
dc.identifier.uri http://prints.iiap.res.in/handle/2248/6816
dc.description Restricted Access © IOP Publishing https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/01/009 en_US
dc.description.abstract Minkowski Tensors are tensorial generalizations of the scalar Minkowski Functionals. Due to their tensorial nature they contain additional morphological information of structures, in particular about shape and alignment, in comparison to the scalar Minkowski functionals. They have recently been used [1] to study the statistical isotropy of temperature and E mode data from the Planck satellite. The calculation in [2] relied on stereographic projection of the fields to extract the shape and alignment information. In this work, we calculate Minkowski Tensors directly on the sphere and compute the net alignment in the data, based on a recent work that extends the definition of Minkowski Tensors to random fields on curved spaces. This method circumvents numerical errors that can be introduced by the stereographic projection. We compare the resulting net alignment parameter values obtained from the frequency coadded CMB temperature data cleaned by the SMICA pipeline, to those obtained from simulations that include instrumental beam effects and residual foreground and noise. We find very good agreement between the two within ≈ 1σ. We further compare the alignments obtained from the beam-convolved CMB maps at individual Planck frequencies to those in the corresponding simulations. We find no significant difference between observed data and simulations across all {\rm Planck} frequencies, except for the 30 GHz channel. For the 30 GHz channel we find ≈ 2 σ difference between the data and the simulations. This mild disagreement could originate from an inaccurate estimation of the instrumental beam at 30 GHz. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher IOP Publishing en_US
dc.subject CMBR experiments en_US
dc.subject CMBR theory en_US
dc.title Search for anomalous alignments of structures in planck data using minkowski tensors en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account