Some comments on the two prism tunnelling experiment

dc.contributor.author	Unnikrishnan, C. S
dc.contributor.author	Murthy, S. A
dc.date.accessioned	2008-07-31T05:12:03Z
dc.date.available	2008-07-31T05:12:03Z
dc.date.issued	1996-09
dc.identifier.citation	Physics Letters A, Vol. 221, No. 1 - 2, pp. 1 - 4	en
dc.identifier.issn	0375-9601
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2248/2959
dc.description	Restricted Access
dc.description.abstract	We show that the two prism tunnelling experiment of Mizobuchi and Ohtake [Phys. Lett. A 168 (1992) 1] does not verify the quantum optical prediction due to insufficient statistical precision in the anticoincidence measurement. We reanalyze their data and show that the observed number of coincidences is actually even larger than what is expected from a classical coherent light source.	en
dc.format.extent	3894 bytes
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.publisher	Elsevier B.V	en
dc.subject	Prism tunneling experiment	en
dc.subject	coherent light source	en
dc.title	Some comments on the two prism tunnelling experiment	en
dc.type	Article	en