Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2248/8963
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChaudhary, Himanshu-
dc.contributor.authorMandal, Ratul-
dc.contributor.authorBashir, Masroor-
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Vipin Kumar-
dc.contributor.authorDebnath, Ujjal-
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-17T05:19:37Z-
dc.date.available2026-06-17T05:19:37Z-
dc.date.issued2026-04-
dc.identifier.citationChinese Physics C, Vol. 50, No. 4, 045103en_US
dc.identifier.issn2058-6132-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2248/8963-
dc.descriptionRestricted Accessen_US
dc.description.abstractWe investigated a time-varying cosmological constant model using recent BAO measurements from DESI DR2, combined with Type Ia supernova samples (Pantheon +, DES-Dovekie, and Union3) and CMB shift parameters, to constrain the Λ(t)CDM model parameters via Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis. We find that the interaction term Q(z) shows a sign change for all dataset combinations by crossing Q(z)=0, depending on the choice of the dataset: at low redshift, Q(z)<0, indicating vacuum energy decaying into dark matter, while at high redshift, Q(z)>0, corresponding to dark matter decaying into vacuum energy. The dynamical system analysis found three critical points, namely, P1,P2, and P3 . The resulting critical points, determined by the underlying cosmological parameters, correspond to distinct epochs in cosmic evolution. Depending on the parameter combinations, these points characterize various cosmological phases, ranging from an accelerated stiff matter-dominated era to late-time accelerated expansion. The stability of each critical point is analyzed using linear stability theory, with the relevant physical constraints on the cosmological parameters duly incorporated throughout the analysis. For each dataset combinations, the Λ(t)CDM model predicts that ω0>−1, showing a preference for dynamical dark energy over the cosmological constant scenario with ω0=−1. Consequently, the model exhibits a transition phase in the range N≡loga(t)≈−0.51 to −0.48 and predicts q0 in the range −0.54 to −0.52, with the precise transition point depending on the choice of dataset. Finally, the Bayesian evidence shows strong support for the Λ(t)CDM model over ΛCDM.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIOP Publishingen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/ae3316-
dc.rights© 2026 Chinese Physical Society and the Institute of High Energy Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Modern Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and IOP Publishing Ltd. All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.-
dc.subjectLambdaen_US
dc.subjectlambdaen_US
dc.subjectOmegaen_US
dc.titleΛ(t)CDM model: Cosmological implications and dynamical system analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:IIAP Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Λ(t)CDM model cosmological implications and dynamical system analysis.pdf
  Restricted Access
3.85 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.