Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2248/8774
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Maggie L-
dc.contributor.authorHo, Anna Y. Q-
dc.contributor.authorRyan, Geoffrey-
dc.contributor.authorPerley, Daniel A-
dc.contributor.authorLamb, Gavin P-
dc.contributor.authorNayana, A. J-
dc.contributor.authorAndreoni, Igor-
dc.contributor.authorAnupama, G. C-
dc.contributor.authorBellm, Eric C-
dc.contributor.authorBerger, E-
dc.contributor.authorBloom, Joshua S-
dc.contributor.authorBurns, Eric-
dc.contributor.authorCaiazzo, Ilaria-
dc.contributor.authorChandra, P-
dc.contributor.authorCoughlin, Michael W-
dc.contributor.authorEl-Badry, Kareem-
dc.contributor.authorGraham, Matthew J-
dc.contributor.authorKasliwal, Mansi M-
dc.contributor.authorKeating, Garrett K-
dc.contributor.authorKulkarni, S. R-
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Harsh-
dc.contributor.authorMasci, Frank J-
dc.contributor.authorPerley, Richard A-
dc.contributor.authorRamprasad Rao-
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez, Antonio C-
dc.contributor.authorRusholme, Ben-
dc.contributor.authorSarin, Nikhil-
dc.contributor.authorSollerman, Jesper-
dc.contributor.authorSrinivasaragavan, Gokul P-
dc.contributor.authorSwain, Vishwajeet-
dc.contributor.authorVanderbosch, Zachary-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-31T10:34:01Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-31T10:34:01Z-
dc.date.issued2025-05-20-
dc.identifier.citationThe Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 985, No. 1, 124en_US
dc.identifier.issn1538-4357-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2248/8774-
dc.descriptionOpen Accessen_US
dc.descriptionOriginal content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI-
dc.description.abstractIn the past few years, the improved sensitivity and cadence of wide-field optical surveys have enabled the discovery of several afterglows without associated detected gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). We present the identification, observations, and multiwavelength modeling of a recent such afterglow (AT2023lcr), and model three literature events (AT2020blt, AT2021any, and AT2021lfa) in a consistent fashion. For each event, we consider the following possibilities as to why a GRBwas not observed: (1) the jet was off-axis; (2) the jet had a low initial Lorentz factor; and (3) the afterglow was the result of an on-axis classical GRB (on-axis jet with physical parameters typical of the GRB population), but the emission was undetected by gamma-ray satellites. We estimate all physical parameters using afterglowpy and Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods from emcee. We find that AT2023lcr, AT2020blt, and AT2021any are consistent with on-axis classical GRBs, and AT2021lfa is consistent with both on-axis low Lorentz factor (Γ0 ≈ 5–13) and off-axis (θobs = 2θjet) high Lorentz factor (Γ0 ≈ 100) jets.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Astronomical Societyen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adc800-
dc.rights© 2025. The Author(s)-
dc.subjectGamma-ray burstsen_US
dc.subjectTransient sourcesen_US
dc.subjectSurveysen_US
dc.subjectSky surveysen_US
dc.subjectRadio transient sourcesen_US
dc.subjectX-ray transient sourcesen_US
dc.titleThe nature of optical afterglows without Gamma-ray bursts: Identification of AT2023lcr and multiwavelength modelingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:IIAP Publications



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.