Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2248/8507
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBanerjee, Bihan-
dc.contributor.authorNarang, Mayank-
dc.contributor.authorManoj, P-
dc.contributor.authorHenning, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorTyagi, Himanshu-
dc.contributor.authorSurya, Arun-
dc.contributor.authorNayak, Prasanta K-
dc.contributor.authorTripathi, Mihir-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-31T05:28:35Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-31T05:28:35Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-01-
dc.identifier.citationThe Astronomical Journal, Vol. 168, No. 1, 7en_US
dc.identifier.issn1538-3881-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2248/8507-
dc.descriptionOpen Accessen_US
dc.descriptionOriginal content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.-
dc.description.abstractGiant planets exhibit diverse orbital properties, hinting at their distinct formation and dynamic histories. In this paper, using Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3), we investigate if and how the orbital properties of Jupiters are linked to their host star properties, particularly their metallicity and age. We obtain metallicities for main-sequence stars of spectral type F, G, and K, hosting hot, warm, and cold Jupiters with varying eccentricities. We compute the velocity dispersions of the host stars of these three groups using kinematic information from Gaia DR3 and obtain average ages using a velocity dispersion–age relation. We find that the host stars of hot Jupiters are relatively metal rich ([Fe/H] = 0.18 ± 0.13) and young (median age of 3.97 ± 0.51 Gyr) compared to the host stars of cold Jupiters in nearly circular orbits, which are relatively metal poor (0.03 ± 0.18) and older (median age of 6.07 ± 0.79 Gyr). The host stars of cold Jupiters in high-eccentricity orbits, on the other hand, show metallicities similar to those of the hosts of hot Jupiters, but are older, on average (median age of 6.25 ± 0.92 Gyr). The similarity in metallicity between the hosts of hot Jupiters and the hosts of cold Jupiters in high-eccentricity orbits supports high-eccentricity migration as the potential origin of hot Jupiters, with the latter serving as the progenitors of hot Jupiters. However, the average age difference between them suggests that the older hot Jupiters may have been engulfed by their host star over timescales ∼ 6 Gyr. This allows us to estimate the value of stellar tidal quality factor, Q'∗ ∼ 106±1.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Astronomical Societyen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ad429f-
dc.rights© 2024. The Author(s)-
dc.subjectGaiaen_US
dc.subjectHot Jupitersen_US
dc.subjectMetallicityen_US
dc.subjectExoplanet migrationen_US
dc.subjectTidal interactionen_US
dc.titleHost-star Properties of Hot, Warm, and Cold Jupiters in the Solar Neighborhood from Gaia Data Release 3: Clues to Formation Pathwaysen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:IIAP Publications



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.