Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2248/8018
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Harsh-
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Rahul-
dc.contributor.authorSaraogi, Divita-
dc.contributor.authorAhumada, Tomás-
dc.contributor.authorAndreoni, Igor-
dc.contributor.authorAnupama, G. C-
dc.contributor.authorAryan, Amar-
dc.contributor.authorBarway, Sudhanshu-
dc.contributor.authorBhalerao, Varun-
dc.contributor.authorChandra, Poonam-
dc.contributor.authorCoughlin, Michael W-
dc.contributor.authorDimple-
dc.contributor.authorDutta, Anirban-
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, Ankur-
dc.contributor.authorHo, Anna Y. Q-
dc.contributor.authorKool, E. C-
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Amit-
dc.contributor.authorMedford, Michael S-
dc.contributor.authorMisra, Kuntal-
dc.contributor.authorPandey, Shashi B-
dc.contributor.authorPerley, Daniel A-
dc.contributor.authorRiddle, Reed-
dc.contributor.authorRor, Amit Kumar-
dc.contributor.authorSetiadi, Jason M-
dc.contributor.authorYao, Yuhan-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T06:12:52Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-23T06:12:52Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-
dc.identifier.citationMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 513, No. 2, pp. 2777–2793en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2966-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2248/8018-
dc.descriptionRestricted Accessen_US
dc.description.abstractWe present results from extensive broadband follow-up of GRB 210204A over the period of 30 d. We detect optical flares in the afterglow at 7.6 × 105 s and 1.1 × 106 s after the burst: the most delayed flaring ever detected in a GRB afterglow. At the source redshift of 0.876, the rest-frame delay is 5.8 × 105 s (6.71 d). We investigate possible causes for this flaring and conclude that the most likely cause is a refreshed shock in the jet. The prompt emission of the GRB is within the range of typical long bursts: it shows three disjoint emission episodes, which all follow the typical GRB correlations. This suggests that GRB 210204A might not have any special properties that caused late-time flaring, and the lack of such detections for other afterglows might be resulting from the paucity of late-time observations. Systematic late-time follow-up of a larger sample of GRBs can shed more light on such afterglow behaviour. Further analysis of the GRB 210204A shows that the late-time bump in the light curve is highly unlikely due to underlying SNe at redshift (z) = 0.876 and is more likely due to the late-time flaring activity. The cause of this variability is not clearly quantifiable due to the lack of multiband data at late-time constraints by bad weather conditions. The flare of GRB 210204A is the latest flare detected to date.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Societyen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1061-
dc.rights© Royal Astronomical Society-
dc.subjectMethods: data analysisen_US
dc.subjectGamma-ray burst: generalen_US
dc.subjectGamma-ray burst: individual: GRB 210204Aen_US
dc.titleThe long-active afterglow of GRB 210204A: detection of the most delayed flares in a gamma-ray bursten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:IIAP Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The long-active afterglow of GRB 210204A detection of the most delayed flares in a gamma-ray burst.pdf
  Restricted Access
6.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.