Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2248/7858
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSafonova, M-
dc.contributor.authorMathur, Archana-
dc.contributor.authorBasak, Suryoday-
dc.contributor.authorBora, Kakoli-
dc.contributor.authorAgrawal, Surbhi-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-24T06:33:05Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-24T06:33:05Z-
dc.date.issued2021-09-
dc.identifier.citationThe European Physical Journal Special Topics, Vol. 230, No. 10, pp. 2207–2220en_US
dc.identifier.issn1951-6401-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2248/7858-
dc.descriptionRestricted Accessen_US
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at springerlink.com-
dc.description.abstractWhat is habitability? Can we quantify it? What do we mean under the term habitable or potentially habitable planet? With estimates of the number of planets in our Galaxy alone running into billions, possibly a number greater than the number of stars, it is high time to start characterizing them, sorting them into classes/types just like stars, to better understand their formation paths, their properties and, ultimately, their ability to beget or sustain life. After all, we do have life thriving on one of these billions of planets, why not on others? Which planets are better suited for life and which ones are definitely not worth spending expensive telescope time on? We need to find sort of quick assessment score, a metric, using which we can make a list of promising planets and dedicate our efforts to them. Exoplanetary habitability is a transdisciplinary subject integrating astrophysics, astrobiology, planetary science, and even terrestrial environmental sciences. It became a challenging problem in astroinformatics, an emerging area in computational astronomy. Here, we review the existing metrics of habitability and the new classification schemes (machine learning (ML), neural networks, activation functions) of extrasolar planets, and provide an exposition of the use of computational intelligence techniques to evaluate habitability scores and to automate the process of classification of exoplanets. We examine how solving convex optimization techniques, as in computing new metrics such as Cobb–Douglas habitability score (CDHS) and constant elasticity earth similarity approach (CEESA), cross-validates ML-based classification of exoplanets. Despite the recent criticism of exoplanetary habitability ranking, we are sure that this field has to continue and evolve to use all available machinery of astroinformatics, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning. It might actually develop into a sort of same scale as stellar types in astronomy, to be used as a quick tool of screening exoplanets in important characteristics in search for potentially habitable planets (PHPs), or Earth-like planets, for detailed follow-up targets.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJointly published by EDP Sciences, Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer Berlin Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00211-z-
dc.rights© EDP Sciences and Springer-Verlag-
dc.titleQuantifying the classification of exoplanets: in search for the right habitability metricen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:IIAP Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Quantifying the classification of exoplanets in search for the right habitability metric.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.46 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.