Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2248/7728
Title: The completed SDSS-IV extended baryon oscillation spectroscopic survey: BAO and RSD measurements from the anisotropic power spectrum of the quasar sample between redshift 0.8 and 2.2
Authors: Neveux, Richard
Burtin, Etienne
Mattia, Arnaud de
Smith, Alex
Ross, Ashley J
Hou, Jiamin
Bautista, Julian
Brinkmann, Jonathan
Chuang, Chia-Hsun
Dawson, Kyle S
Gil-Marin, Hector
Lyke, Brad W
Macorra, Axel de la
Bourboux, Helion du Mas des
Mohammad, Faizan G
Muller, Eva-Maria
Myers, Adam D
Newman, Jeffrey A
Percival, Will J
Rossi, Graziano
Schneider, Donald
Vivek, M
Zarrouk, Pauline
Zhao, Cheng
Zhao, Gong-Bo
Keywords: Galaxies
Distances and redshifts
Dark energy
Distance scale
Large-scale structure of Universe
Cosmology
Observations
Issue Date: Nov-2020
Publisher: Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society
Citation: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 499, No. 1, pp. 210-229
Abstract: We measure the clustering of quasars of the final data release (DR16) of eBOSS. The sample contains 343708 quasars between redshifts 0.8 ≤ z ≤ 2.2 over 4699deg2⁠. We calculate the Legendre multipoles (0,2,4) of the anisotropic power spectrum and perform a BAO and a Full-Shape (FS) analysis at the effective redshift zeff = 1.480. The errors include systematic errors that amount to 1/3 of the statistical error. The systematic errors comprise a modelling part studied using a blind N-body mock challenge and observational effects studied with approximate mocks to account for various types of redshift smearing and fibre collisions. For the BAO analysis, we measure the transverse comoving distance DM(zeff)/rdrag = 30.60 ± 0.90 and the Hubble distance DH(zeff)/rdrag = 13.34 ± 0.60. This agrees with the configuration space analysis, and the consensus yields: DM(zeff)/rdrag = 30.69 ± 0.80 and DH(zeff)/rdrag = 13.26 ± 0.55. In the FS analysis, we fit the power spectrum using a model based on Regularised Perturbation Theory, which includes redshift space distortions and the Alcock–Paczynski effect. The results are DM(zeff)/rdrag = 30.68 ± 0.90 and DH(zeff)/rdrag = 13.52 ± 0.51 and we constrain the linear growth rate of structure f(zeff)σ8(zeff) = 0.476 ± 0.047. Our results agree with the configuration space analysis. The consensus analysis of the eBOSS quasar sample yields: DM(zeff)/rdrag = 30.21 ± 0.79, DH(zeff)/rdrag = 3.23 ± 0.47, and f(zeff)σ8(zeff) = 0.462 ± 0.045 and is consistent with a flat ΛCDM cosmological model using Planck results.
Description: Restricted Access
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2248/7728
ISSN: 1365-2966
Appears in Collections:IIAP Publications



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.