Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2248/7682
Title: An overview of and issues with sky radiometer technology and SKYNET
Authors: Nakajima, T
Campanelli, M
Che, Huizheng
Estelles, V
Irie, Hitoshi
Kim, Sang-Woo
Kim, Jhoon
Liu, Dong
Nishizawa, T
Pandithurai, Govindan
Soni, Vijay Kumar
Thana, Boossarasiri
Tugjsurn, Nas-Urt
Aoki, Kazuma
Sujung Go
Hashimoto, Makiko
Higurashi, Akiko
Kazadzis, Stelios
Khatri, Pradeep
Kouremeti, Natalia
Kudo, Rei
Marenco, Franco
Momoi, Masahiro
Shantikumar, N. S
Ryder, Claire L
Uchiyama, Akihiro
Yamazaki, Akihiro
Keywords: sky radiometer technology
SKYNET
Langley (IL) method
calibration constant F0
Issue Date: Aug-2020
Publisher: European Geosciences Union
Citation: Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol. 13, No. 8, pp. 4195–4218
Abstract: This paper is an overview of the progress in sky radiometer technology and the development of the network called SKYNET. It is found that the technology has produced useful on-site calibration methods, retrieval algorithms, and data analyses from sky radiometer observations of aerosol, cloud, water vapor, and ozone. A formula was proposed for estimating the accuracy of the sky radiometer calibration constant F0 using the improved Langley (IL) method, which was found to be a good approximation to observed monthly mean uncertainty in F0, around 0.5 % to 2.4 % at the Tokyo and Rome sites and smaller values of around 0.3 % to 0.5 % at the mountain sites at Mt. Saraswati and Davos. A new cross IL (XIL) method was also developed to correct an underestimation by the IL method in cases with large aerosol retrieval errors. The root-mean-square difference (RMSD) in aerosol optical thickness (AOT) comparisons with other networks took values of less than 0.02 for λ ≥ 500 nm and a larger value of about 0.03 for shorter wavelengths in city areas and smaller values of less than 0.01 in mountain comparisons. Accuracies of single-scattering albedo (SSA) and size distribution retrievals are affected by the propagation of errors in measurement, calibrations for direct solar and diffuse sky radiation, ground albedo, cloud screening, and the version of the analysis software called the Skyrad pack. SSA values from SKYNET were up to 0.07 larger than those from AERONET, and the major error sources were identified as an underestimation of solid viewing angle (SVA) and cloud contamination. Correction of these known error factors reduced the SSA difference to less than 0.03. Retrievals of other atmospheric constituents by the sky radiometer were also reviewed. Retrieval accuracies were found to be about 0.2 cm for precipitable water vapor amount and 13 DU (Dobson Unit) for column ozone amount. Retrieved cloud optical properties still showed large deviations from validation data, suggesting a need to study the causes of the differences. It is important that these recent studies on improvements presented in the present paper are introduced into the existing operational systems and future systems of the International SKYNET Data Center.
Description: Restricted Access © Author(s) https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4195-2020
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2248/7682
ISSN: 1867-1381
Appears in Collections:IIAP Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
An overview of and issues with sky radiometer technology and SKYNET.pdf
  Restricted Access
6.51 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.