1. IIA Institutional Repository
  2. IIAP Publications
  3. IIAP Publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2248/2959
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUnnikrishnan, C. S-
dc.contributor.authorMurthy, S. A-
dc.date.accessioned2008-07-31T05:12:03Z-
dc.date.available2008-07-31T05:12:03Z-
dc.date.issued1996-09-
dc.identifier.citationPhysics Letters A, Vol. 221, No. 1 - 2, pp. 1 - 4en
dc.identifier.issn0375-9601-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2248/2959-
dc.descriptionRestricted Access-
dc.description.abstractWe show that the two prism tunnelling experiment of Mizobuchi and Ohtake [Phys. Lett. A 168 (1992) 1] does not verify the quantum optical prediction due to insufficient statistical precision in the anticoincidence measurement. We reanalyze their data and show that the observed number of coincidences is actually even larger than what is expected from a classical coherent light source.en
dc.format.extent3894 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevier B.Ven
dc.subjectPrism tunneling experimenten
dc.subjectcoherent light sourceen
dc.titleSome comments on the two prism tunnelling experimenten
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:IIAP Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Some comments on the two prism tunnelling experiment
  Restricted Access		Restricted Access431.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.